tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2220966763638300672.post6929194776244039290..comments2023-07-29T05:11:23.558-04:00Comments on Climate Observations: NODC Ocean Heat Content (0-700 Meters) Versus GISS ProjectionsBob Tisdalehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15462377647970214137noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2220966763638300672.post-56144291079043006342009-10-15T15:40:24.069-04:002009-10-15T15:40:24.069-04:00fred: You asked, "i cant reproduce the climat...fred: You asked, "i cant reproduce the climate explorer graph, has the data changed?"<br /><br />Yes it has. Refer to the KNMI new page:<br />http://climexp.knmi.nl/news.cgi?someone@somewhere<br /><br />They write, "There was an error in the last 3-month data point of the NODC ocean heat content dataset, as anyone who made a map of the data could see. The problem has been fixed at NODC (thanks Gavin, Tim)."Bob Tisdalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15462377647970214137noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2220966763638300672.post-77856924573097214362009-10-15T15:10:37.185-04:002009-10-15T15:10:37.185-04:00i cant reproduce the climate explorer graph, has t...i cant reproduce the climate explorer graph, has the data changed?frednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2220966763638300672.post-19333496201329988132009-10-13T17:33:44.762-04:002009-10-13T17:33:44.762-04:00John: I have not run across a paper that compares...John: I have not run across a paper that compares OHC to SST. SST is a small component of OHC; it's the first few meters of the 0-700m depth; but OHC is also impacted by other variables such as salinity.<br /><br />And yes, I've used the corrected KNMI data. KNMI updated the data at the same time that they corrected it. Can't get the updated data that hasn't been corrected.<br /><br />RegardsBob Tisdalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15462377647970214137noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2220966763638300672.post-88453343194884271732009-10-13T12:35:06.838-04:002009-10-13T12:35:06.838-04:00Sorry for the double post, but I assume this Jan-J...Sorry for the double post, but I assume this Jan-June 2009 data reflects the corrects you mention NODC made to their OHC numbers as of Oct 1? This Jan-June data set was released in September, right? <br /><br />Just wanted to make sure this isn't uncorrected data. I'm sure you've thought of that, but just checking.Johnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2220966763638300672.post-42422176862101557792009-10-13T12:31:37.121-04:002009-10-13T12:31:37.121-04:00Thanks Bob, I was wondering about the state of the...Thanks Bob, I was wondering about the state of the current comparison since I saw Pielke Sr.'s post months ago.<br /><br />I know OHC is a measure down to 700m, but are you aware of any effort to map a projected change in OHC to a change in SST? If an increasing OHC is supposed to be a measure of AGW [current or future, I have no idea], have they made any effort to show how that OHC maps to temperatures at the surface?<br /><br />The flat OHC since 2003 seems to match the mostly flat SST temperatures, so I was curious if there has been any correlation made.<br /><br />Thanks in advance, and thanks for another great post.Johnnoreply@blogger.com